Are top-cited papers more interdisciplinary?
نویسندگان
چکیده
Over the last decade, the relationship between interdisciplinarity and scientific impact has been the focus of many bibliometric papers, with diverging results. This paper aims at contributing to this body of research, by analyzing the level of interdisciplinarity, compiled with the Simpson Index, of the top 1% most highly cited papers and of papers with lower citation percentile ranks. Results shows that the top 1% most cited papers exhibit higher levels of interdisciplinarity than papers in other citation rank classes and that this relationship is observed in more than 90% of NSF specialties. This suggest that interdisciplinary research plays a more important role in generating high impact knowledge.
منابع مشابه
مقالههای بینالمللی پراستناد علوم پزشکی کشور در پایگاه اسکوپوس: 2010 تا 2014
Introduction: Scientific output of the Islamic Republic of Iran in Medical Sciences has been increased during recent years as reflected in Scopus database. Moreover, highly cited papers of researchers, institutions and countries can be used in order to study the citation impact and quality of scientific output. The current study investigates the quality of Medical Sciences’ scholarly outp...
متن کاملHighly-cited papers in software engineering: The top-100
Context: According to the search reported in this paper, as of this writing (May 2015), a very large number of papers (more than 70,000) have been published in the area of Software Engineering (SE) since its inception in 1968. Citations are crucial in any research area to position the work and to build on the work of others. Identification and characterization of highly-cited papers are common ...
متن کاملHow are excellent (highly cited) papers defined in bibliometrics? A quantitative analysis of the literature
As the subject of research excellence has received increasing attention (in science policy) over the last few decades, increasing numbers of bibliometric studies have been published dealing with excellent papers. However, many different methods have been used in these studies to identify excellent papers. The present quantitative analysis of the literature has been carried out in order to acqui...
متن کاملThe top 100 cited neurorehabilitation papers.
BACKGROUND Neurorehabilitation covers a large range of disorders, assessment approaches and treatment methods. There have been previous citation analyses of rehabilitation and of its subfields. However, there has never been a comprehensive citation analysis in neurorehabilitation. OBJECTIVE The present study reports findings from a citation analysis of the top 100 most cited neurorehabilitati...
متن کاملPeer-Selected “Best Papers”—Are They Really That “Good”?
BACKGROUND Peer evaluation is the cornerstone of science evaluation. In this paper, we analyze whether or not a form of peer evaluation, the pre-publication selection of the best papers in Computer Science (CS) conferences, is better than random, when considering future citations received by the papers. METHODS Considering 12 conferences (for several years), we collected the citation counts f...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- J. Informetrics
دوره 9 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2015